• SATISH C TRIPATHI

      Articles written in Journal of Earth System Science

    • Facies architecture and depositional evolution of Palaeocene–Eocene, Subathu Formation, Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India

      Mishra S R Rabisankar Karmakar Satish C Tripathi Mridul Gupta Rajuram Sarswat

      More Details Abstract Fulltext PDF

      The Late Palaeocene–Middle Eocene marine sedimentary sequence of the Himalayan foreland basin, represented by the rocks of Subathu Formation, is enriched with the presence of foraminifera, bryozoa, corals, gastropods, bivalves and so on within both carbonate and clastic dominant lithologies. The carbonate and the shale consist mainly of larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) and the assemblage is composed of Nummulites and Assilina along with the other skeletal and non-skeletal components. The presence of a palaeosol at the base of Subathu indicates a gap in sedimentation. The lithological and biotic assemblages along with the bed form, bed geometry and primary sedimentary features helped us to establish four facies associations, A, B, C and D, and have been corroborated with the shoreline migration (transgression/regression) history. The facies association-A, representing the basal horizons of Subathu Formation, indicates the onset of transgression and deposition in lagoonal condition with carbonaceous shale and oolitic ironstone, followed by the facies association-B and -C deposited in shallow marine shoreface. The uppermost unit, i.e., the medium- to coarse-grained sandstone (facies association-D) of Subathu Formation, represents a fall in relative sea level (progradational stacking pattern), whereas the underlying contact between the facies association-B and -C is represented by an aggradational stacking pattern between the siltstone and the shale, but certainly without exposing the shelf. Petrographic studies based on characteristic features such as framework constituent, the percentage of matrix and grains, nature of cementing material, textural features and fossil content help to deduce a distinct change in depositional setting from an open marine (shelf) to shoal, a lagoon that gradually grades to foreshore/beach environment. The study reveals that the basin has gone through a transgressive (facies association-A and -B), regressive (facies association-C) as well as distinct forced regressive (facies association-D) phase of shoreline migration history.

    • Mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sedimentation in the Upper Cretaceous Nilkanth Formation, Garhwal Himalaya, India

      SHRUTI R MISHRA ADITI SHARMA PARTHA P CHAKRABORTY SARADA P MOHANTY SATISH C TRIPATHI

      More Details Abstract Fulltext PDF

      The Upper Cretaceous Nilkanth Formation awaits a process-based depositional model despite being a topic of discussion between stratigraphers, palaeobiologists and structural geologists over the last few decades. Sedimentary facies analysis of a $\sim$50 m thick section along a $\sim$2.8 km long section along Rishikesh–Tal Bidhashini in Pauri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand allowed documentation of mixed carbonate–silicicalstic facies types, dominantly consisting of sand- and pebble-sized carbonate debris mixed with siliciclastics in a proximal to distal facies tract. Ten different facies types that include matrix rich and matrix-poor shelly conglomerate, mixed clastic-carbonate wackestone, packstone, impure calcirudite and calcarenite, biomicrite and ferruginous sandstone are documented. Delineation of facies association and documentation of facies stacking pattern provide a post-Santonian mixed carbonate– siliciclastic sedimentation history of the Nilkanth Formation, deposited in the form of mass flows of varied rheology on a barred low- to moderate-gradient carbonate ramp, formed at the leading edge of the India plate before its collision with the Kohistan–Ladakh arc. Carbonate clasts comprising bivalves, crinoids, algae, bryozoan, etc., were produced in a narrow high-energy transgressive coastline and supplied across shelf along with reworked siliciclastics from clastic shoreface bar. It is argued that the reworked fossils, including the bryozoa Ceriocava Nilkanthi, present within massflows may not justify fixing of an absolute age for the formation but may definitely help in providing an age range.

  • Journal of Earth System Science | News

    • Editorial Note on Continuous Article Publication

      Posted on July 25, 2019

      Click here for Editorial Note on CAP Mode

© 2021-2022 Indian Academy of Sciences, Bengaluru.