Renee M Borges
Articles written in Journal of Biosciences
Volume 23 Issue 3 September 1998 pp 164-167 Clipboard
CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides as new generation adjuvants in DNA and protein vaccines
Volume 25 Issue 2 June 2000 pp 121-122
Clipboard: How asymmetrical before it’s asymmetrical?
Volume 25 Issue 3 September 2000 pp 215-216 Clipboard
Volume 26 Issue 2 June 2001 pp 121-122 Clipboard
Ant and human farmers face similar problems
Volume 26 Issue 3 September 2001 pp 289-291 Clipboard
Volume 27 Issue 2 March 2002 pp 75-78 Commentary
Warring ants: Lessons from Lanchester’s laws of combat?
Volume 30 Issue 1 February 2005 pp 41-50
Do plants and animals differ in phenotypic plasticity?
This paper compares the flexibility in the nexus between phenotype and genotype in plants and animals. These taxa although considered to be fundamentally different are found to be surprisingly similar in the mechanisms used to achieve plasticity. Although non-cognitive behaviour occurs in plants, its range is limited, while morphological and developmental plasticity also occur to a considerable extent in animals. Yet both plants and animals are subject to unique constraints and thus need to find unique solutions to functional problems. A true comparison between the plant and animal phenotype would be a comparison between plants and sessile photosynthesizing colonial invertebrates. Such comparisons are lacking. However, they would provide important insights into the adaptive significance of plasticity in these groups. It is also suggested that a comparison of inflexible traits in these groups would provide an understanding of the constraints, as well as the costs and benefits, of a plastic versus non-plastic phenotype in plants and animals.
Volume 31 Issue 5 December 2006 pp 503-505 Clipboard
Pictures at an exhibition: Bees view Van Gogh’s
Volume 34 Issue 3 September 2009 pp 349-351
Clipboard: Of pungency, pain, and naked mole rats: chili peppers revisited
Volume 34 Issue 4 October 2009 pp 605-611 Articles
Phenotypic plasticity and longevity in plants and animals: cause and effect?
Immobile plants and immobile modular animals outlive unitary animals. This paper discusses competing but not necessarily mutually exclusive theories to explain this extreme longevity, especially from the perspective of phenotypic plasticity. Stem cell immortality, vascular autonomy, and epicormic branching are some important features of the phenotypic plasticity of plants that contribute to their longevity. Monocarpy versus polycarpy can also influence the kind of senescent processes experienced by plants. How density-dependent phenomena affecting the establishment of juveniles in these immobile organisms can influence the evolution of senescence, and consequently longevity, is reviewed and discussed. Whether climate change scenarios will favour long-lived or short-lived organisms, with their attendant levels of plasticity, is also presented.
Volume 35 Issue 2 June 2010 pp 267-279 Articles
Genetic and clonal diversity of the endemic ant-plant
Suma A Dev Megha Shenoy Renee M Borges
Volume 48 All articles Published: 28 March 2023 Article ID 0010 Editorial
A Braver New World? Of chatbots and other cognoscenti
Volume 48, 2023
Continuous Article Publishing mode
Click here for Editorial Note on CAP Mode