• Fulltext

       

        Click here to view fulltext PDF


      Permanent link:
      https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/026/11/1559-1565

    • Keywords

       

      Risk perception, medical statistics, innate quantitative ability, evolved statistical sense.

    • Abstract

       

      In public health literature, the risk of death or disease associated with genetic, dietary, environmental, or behavioral factors is most commonly denoted by the odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), or risk ratio (RR). But how do people intuitively perceive risk? We conducted a small experiment in which respondents of different ages, sex, and education were asked to rank the risks associated with four different habits based on the incidence data of an imaginary deadly disease. Results showed that people judge risk by probability difference rather than probability ratio. Even individuals formally trained to use OR and HR as risk indicators preferred using probability differences over ratios to judge their own risk. This preliminary inquiry into intuitive statistical perception suggests that designing statistical indices based on people’s innate perception may be a better strategy than trying to educate people to understand the indices designed by expert statisticians.

    • Author Affiliations

       

      Harshada Vidwans Rohini Kharate Milind Watve1

      1. E-1-8, Girija Shankar Vihar Karve Nagar Pune 411 052, India
    • Dates

       

© 2021-2022 Indian Academy of Sciences, Bengaluru.