Popularizing
Science
Popularization of science is what Resonance is all about. Carl Sagan
(1934-1996) was an American astronomer. His book Cosmic Connection introduced
the results of researches in astronomy to wider audiences. His later
works The Dragon of Eden and Brocas Brain have done the same for
recent advances in the theory of evolution and neurophysiology. In a
further work, Cosmos (1980), based on a major TV series, Sagan traced
the history of physics and astronomy. The book stayed on the New York
Times bestseller list for over 100 weeks and sold more copies than any
other science book ever published. So famous did he become that a Sagan
Effect took hold in science.
Loosely stated, it implied that ones popularity with the general
public was inversely proportional to the quantity and quality of real
science being done. Harvard Universitys refusal of Sagans
bid for tenure, and the National Academy of Sciences rejection
of the nomination of Sagan for membership, were both a direct effect
of this Sagan effect. Michael B Shermer*
has evaluated that Sagans total career publications were 500 versus
S J Gou-lds 779, E Mayrs 714 and E O Wilsons 388
all three were Harvard dons. Plotting Sagans rate of publishing
popular articles versus scientific papers revealed that the latter was
unaffected by the former, even after he attained superstardom after
1980. Then why did the scientific community entertain a belief in a
Sagan effect, which obviously did not exist? It is because of the widely
held erroneous principle that only those who cannot do science are reduced
to writing about it (as G H Hardy said of mathematics). May be this
is why we do not have more D D Kosambis, Jayant Narlikars and Madhav
Gadgils. A pity for publications like Resonance.
*M B Shermer, This view of science: Stephen J Gould
as historian of science and science historian, popular scientist and
scientific popularizer, Social Studies of Science, 32/4, pp. 489-524,
2002.