|
About
Resonance
Editorial
Board
Guidelines
Subscribe
Current Issue
March 2004
(Contents)
Back Issues
|
Classics

The April 25 1953 issue of the journal
Nature carried three classic papers collectively entitled Molecular
Structure of Nucleic Acids published back to back. The paper by
Rosalind Franklin and R G Gosling was preceded by the paper of Watson
and Crick that announced their famous model of DNA and one from the
Wilkins group. For most biologists, the paper by Watson and Crick is
very lucid, as it is not constrained by hard data and interpretations,
whereas the one by Franklin and Gosling is elegant but technical. All
the same, among the three, only Franklins had real data relevant
to the model, her beautiful X-ray photograph of B-DNA and the parameters
of the double helix calculated from it. Yet, it is ironic that the paper
gives the impression of being just an afterthought, with the statement
Thus, our general ideas are not inconsistent with the model proposed
by Watson and Crick in the preceding communication. With her insight
and original data, Rosalind Franklin would have been the most likely
person who would have solved the structure of DNA if Watson and Crick
had not seen her data and come up with the model first. But her approach
would have been more formal, deducing it from first principles using
Fourier transforms, as she was not in favour of short-cut methods such
as model building. The full text of her classic paper is reproduced
below.
S Mahadevan
Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate
Rosalind E Franklin* and R G Gosling
Sodium thymonucleate fibres give
two distinct types of X-ray diagram. The first corresponds to a crystalline
form, structure A, obtained at about 75 per cent relative humidity;
a study of this is described in detail elsewhere [1]. At higher humidities
a different structure, structure B, showing a lower degree of order
, appears and persists over a wide range of ambient humidity. The change
from A to B is reversible. The water content of structure B fibres which
undergo this reversible change may vary from 40-50 per cent to several
hundred per cent of the dry weight. Moreover, some fibres never show
structure A, and in thew structure B can be obtained with an even lower
water content.
|