A characteristic common to most
good scientists is an openness of mind; a wannabe scientist is told and
advised to cultivate these attributes. I tried an informal
experiment; I told some scientists that here were facts whose
authenticity is in question. First, that a certain coffee is made
from beans passed through the digestive system of a monkey.
Next, that in a place called Roswell, nonhuman dead bodies were
found at the site where a UFO had crashed. Almost all of them
strongly voiced their skepticism about one or the other irrespective
of whether they had any knowledge of either. Was this
skepticism genuine or was it caused by fear of
ridicule? Could it be that a great scientist is set apart from an
ordinary one by a natural disposition to retain that keen edge of
curiosity and openness throughout her life?
It seems that belief in the ability to resolve a question provides a
strong psychological impetus in actually resolving it. Soon
after Faltings solved Mordell’s conjecture posed many years
earlier, there were solutions by other approaches like
Vojta’s. Fermat’s last theorem was solved soon after contemporary
development was connected to it even though modern developments did
play a decisive role.
Perhaps, a wild imagination helps. One of the foremost
contemporary mathematicians, Armand Borel, who passed away last August,
writing to J K Rowling conveying his admiration of her work,
hinted that the “quickness and cleverness of Indians (not just
mathematicians)” may be partly due to their familiarity from their
childhood with epics like the Ramayana and the Maha-bharata
“compared to which our fairy tales are no match” !
This issue features S S Pillai, one of the greatest Indian
mathemati-cians who is not as well-known to the average Indian as
Ramanujan. One reason may have been his untimely death at the
peak of his career, in an air crash while on the way to spend a year at
Princeton.
Email: sury@isibang.ac.in