In this issue, honouring the great Indian palaeobotanist Birbal Sahni,
we have chosen to print an abridged and slightly edited version of the
Presidential Address delivered by him at the Annual Meeting of the National
Academy of Sciences, India, on 5th March 1938, an address reproduced
in full in the journal Current Science, Vol 61, 1991, pp.594-600. It
is an interesting address to read with the benefit of a further 65 years
of evolutionary research, for the topic Birbal Sahni chose to discuss
then is still a live issue in evolutionary biology today. Basically,
the issue is that of the repeated pattern of the sudden (in geological
terms) appearance of new species in the fossil record, after a long
period of stasis, without evidence of any intermediate forms that would
be expected under the notion of evolution as a gradualistic process
of transformation of one species into another. This issue came into
prominence once again in 1972 when Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould
put forward the theory of punctuated equilibrium to explain this pattern
in the fossil record (see Resonance
2002 Vol 7, No.11, pp.2-5).
It is worthwhile, when reading this piece, to remind oneself of the
year 1938. The Neo-Darwinian synthesis was far from complete,
population genetics theory was yet to be appreciated by the majority
of evolutionists, and the clear distinction made today between mechanisms
and rates of micro-evolution (adaptive evolutionary change within populations
of a species) and macro-evolution (origin of new species, genera etc.)
was far fuzzier. These were also the days when Darwinism was equated
with gradualism, the notion that new species arose only by the slow,
incremental transformation of pre-existing species. In fact, gradualism
is not central to a Darwinian view of adaptive evolution as occurring
largely through natural selection, and is no longer considered an important
part of Darwinism today. Even in Darwins time, his friend T H
Huxley had tried to convince him to drop his emphasis on gradualism,
calling it a mill-stone.
What I found most interesting about this address by Birbal Sahni is
the intimate look it gives us at the workings of a first-rate scientific
mind. Faced with the empirical evidence of sudden appearance of new
flora in fossil strata, Sahni discusses with clarity, and rejects, the
possible explanation that the data could be explained as mere imperfections
in the fossil record. He then goes on to critically discuss various
speculative hypotheses that had been proposed to explain the observed
patterns in the fossil strata. Finally, he goes beyond his own field
of specialization to the relatively new field of experimental cytogenetics,
and marshals evidence supporting his hypothesis that adverse climatic
conditions may, in fact, lead to major changes in chromosome number,
thus facilitating the rapid evolution of new species. This is a great
example of a scientific mind at work: examining data critically, proposing
hypotheses, and marshalling evidence from disparate fields of research
in order to put the hypotheses to empirical test. The notion of environmental
change somehow facilitating rapid evolution also resonates today in
light of recent findings on the unmasking of genetic variation in stressful
conditions, and the conversion of non-additive to additive genetic variance
during population bottlenecks or environmental change. Stasis and rapid
evolutionary change, as well as evolvability, and its evolution under
different environmental scenarios, are today topics receiving much attention
from evolutionary geneticists, and Sahnis early speculations about
the role of cytogenetic changes in periods of rapid evolutionary change
are a sobering reminder that we often keep re-discovering, under ever
newer names, the same basic ideas and insights that have periodically
occurred to our many predecessors in the quest for understanding that
is science.
Amitabh Joshi
Revolutions in the Plant World
Birbal Sahni
Presidential address delivered at the annual
meeting of the
National Academy of Sciences, 5 March 1938.
As the subject of my address today I have chosen a small
theme embraced by that ocean of ideas that we call evolution. The particular
aspect that I propose to deal with is revolutions in the plant world.
As in the history of nations, so also in that of plants
and animals, we find that after a period of gradual change, which we
generally call evolution, there comes inevitably a revolution
a period of rapid transition, when things begin to move faster and on
a different plane. These revolutions in the organic world are the landmarks
of geological history. Each of them marks a large-scale extinction of
plant and animal life as well as a more or less sudden appearance of
forms of life previously unknown. So striking is this fact of the sudden
appearance of new species, genera and families that it is in sharp conflict
with the Darwinian doctrine of natural selection as the only or even
the chief explanation for the origin of new forms of life. Evolution
in the sense of a gradual, orderly process of change is an undisputed
fact. But evolution in this gradual sense is not the whole of organic
evolution as revealed by the geological record. Periodic revolutions
are an integral and essential part of evolution, and it may well be
that they form the more important part, so far as the creation of new
forms is concerned. At all events the orthodox idea of natural selection
through the gradual accumulation of continuous variations utterly fails
to explain some of the glaring facts of palaeontology.
Read full article (46 Kb)