[ BACK TO CONTENTS ]
|
|
| Foreword |
1-2 |
|
|
|
|
Evelyn Fox Keller |
3-10 |
|
The use of Xenopus oocytes and embryos as a route towards cell replacement J B Gurdon |
11-14 |
|
Meenal Vyas and Durgadas P Kasbekar |
15-20 |
|
Stochasticity or the fatal ‘imperfection’ of cloning Reiner A Veitia |
21-30 |
|
The return of the whole organism Patrick Bateson |
31-39 |
|
Do plants and animals differ in phenotypic plasticity? Renee M Borges |
41-50 |
|
Anindya Sinha |
51-64 |
|
Scott F Gilbert |
65-74 |
|
Stuart A Newman |
75-85 |
|
Can morphogenesis be understood in terms of physical rules? Ryuji Takaki |
87-92 |
|
Ashwin Kotnis, Rajiv Sarin and Rita Mulherkar
|
93-102 |
|
Emergentism as a default: Cancer as a problem of tissue organization Ana M Soto and Carlos Sonnenschein |
103-118 |
|
Language from a biological perspective Mohinish Shukla |
119-127 |
|
D Vasanta |
129-137 |
|
The nature-nurture controversy in its most recent avatar: A response to Shukla and Vasanta Prathibha Karanth |
139-142 |
Indexed in CURRENT CONTENTS
CABS (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences)
Geo Abstracts
GEOBASE
EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
Index Medicus and MEDLINE