| Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: shorter duration of copulation during second mating as compared to first mating |
B N Singh* and S R Singh
Genetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
*Corresponding author (Fax, 91-542-317074; Email, bnsingh@banaras.ernet.in).
Drosophila ananassae, a cosmopolitan and domestic species, belongs to the ananassae subgroup of the melanogaster species group. Female remating was observed in ten mass culture stocks of this species, which were initiated from flies collected from different geographic localities. The frequency of female remating ranges from 24% to 56% in different strains. Strains show significant variation in remating latency (days). Significant variation has also been found in all the stocks for duration of copulation between first and second matings. The duration of copulation is shorter in second mating as compared to first mating in D. ananassae.
Since sexual behaviour of males and females affects and modifies the contribution of different genotypes to the gene pool of succeeding generations, it becomes an important component of fitness. In Drosophila, successful mating depends on male activity and female receptivity because usually the female is the discriminating partner in the mating act, i.e., she actively accepts or rejects a courting male (Bateman 1948; Bastock 1956). A large number of investigations on sexual behaviour in various Drosophila species have been carried out by numerous investigators (for references see Spiess 1970; Parsons 1973; Spieth and Ringo 1983; Sisodia and Singh 1996; Yamamoto et al 1997; Casares et al 1998).
Female remating is an important aspect of sexual behaviour in Drosophila because females store the sperm after mating in the spermathecae and ventral receptacles and utilize them to fertilize eggs as they are laid. Once a virgin female Drosophila has mated, she is usually unwilling to accept another male for some time. The length of this refractory period varies between species and in different strains of the same species (Manning 1962). Remating is common in females of many species of Drosophila under both natural and laboratory conditions (Dobzhansky and Pavlovsky 1967; Anderson 1974; Richmond and Ehrman 1974; Milkman and Zeitler 1974; Cobbs 1977; Gromko and Pyle 1978; Craddock and Johnson 1978; Loukas et al 1981; Markow and Ankey 1984; Markow 1985; Barbadilla et al 1991; Etges and Heed 1992; Aspi 1992; Aspi and Lankinen 1992; Schwartz and Boake 1992; Joly and Lachaise 1993; Chapman et al 1994; Service and Vossbrink 1996; McRobert et al 1997; Singh and Singh 1997). The phenomenon of remating by females is a prerequisite for the occurrence of sperm competition between males (Parker 1970). The total impact of sperm competition on male fitness (Gromko and Pyle 1978) and the significant effect of remating on the fitness of the female (Pyle and Gromko 1978) combine to make an excellent example of sexual selection. In Drosophila melanogaster, a longer delay of female remating is due to the transfer of a large amount of sperm (Letsinger and Gromko 1985). However, Service and Vossbrink (1996) found that a longer delay in remating was associated with a slower use of stored sperm.
Drosophila ananassae, a cosmopolitan
and domestic species, belongs to the ananassae subgroup of the melanogaster
species group. It occupies a unique status among Drosophila species due to certain
peculiarities in its genetic behaviour such as spontaneous meiotic male recombination,
varied chromosomal polymorphism, high mutability, Y-4 linkage of the nucleolus organizer,
segregation distortion, parthenogenesis, extra chromosomal inheritance and lack of
coadaptation (Singh 1985, 1996). D. ananassae has been extensively used for
genetical studies particularly population genetics, behavioural genetics and crossing over
(Singh 1985, 1996; Tobari 1993). The results of mating propensity tests in wildtype
strains, mutant strains and inversion karyotypes and the results of selection experiment
provide evidence for genetic control of sexual behaviour in D. ananassae
(Singh and Chatterjee 1986, 1987, 1988a, b; Chatterjee and Singh 1987, 1988).
Further, males contribute more to the variation in sexual activity than females and thus
are more subject to intrasexual selection than females (Singh and Chatterjee 1987). A
positive correlation between mating activity and fertility has been found in isofemale
strains of D. ananassae (Singh and Chatterjee 1987). The existence of rare
male mating advantage has also been reported in D. ananassae (Singh and
Chatterjee 1989). Evidence for polygenic control of pupation site preference and
oviposition site preference has been presented in
D. ananassae (Singh and Pandey 1993; Srivastava and Singh 1996). Mating
propensity, courtship time, duration of copulation and fertility have been tested in mass
culture wildtype strains of D. ananassae derived from different geographic
localities and the results indicate that receptivity of females shows more variation than
male mating ability and there is a positive correlation between duration of copulation and
fertility in D. ananassae (Singh B N and Singh S R 1999; Singh S R and Singh
B N 1999).
In this paper, we report the results of our studies on female remating in D. ananassae with particular reference to the frequency of female remating, remating days and duration of copulation in first and second matings in several mass culture wildtype strains.
2. Materials and methods

To study female remating frequency in D. ananassae, ten mass culture wildtype strains established from large numbers of flies collected from different geographic localities were used. Details of these stocks and the year of collection are given in table 1. All these stocks are being maintained on a simple culture medium by transferring 50 flies (females and males in equal numbers) to fresh culture bottles in each generation and have spent varying number of generations in the laboratory. In each stock, males and females were collected as virgins under ether anaesthesia and aged for seven days in food vials. First time female matings were obtained by placing seven days old virgin females individually in a food vial with a single male seven days of age. The pair was observed for 60 min. When mating occurred, courtship time and duration of copulation were recorded for each mated pair. Females failing to mate during a 60 min observation period were discarded. Males were aspirated out from the observation vial within 30 min of the completion of copulation. The next morning, fertilized females were paired with new mate partners in fresh food vials and were observed continuously for 2 h. After these 2 h, the males were discarded from the vials and the same procedure was repeated on twelve consecutive mornings with fresh males (Gromko and Pyle 1978). When remating occurred, the duration of copulation was noted for each pair. Remating days (the number of days spent after the first mating until the female accepts to copulate again within 12 days) were also noted for each mated pair. The females remating during this time were no longer given the opportunity to remate. In this way 50 females were observed in each of the ten strains for remating frequency, remating days and the duration of copulation in first and second matings (remating). All the tests were performed in a room maintained at approximately 24°C temperature under normal laboratory light condition (about 1000 lux; 12 : 12 light : dark regime) during morning hours (711 AM). All the strains were tested concurrently.
The c 2 test was used to test the hypothesis that the frequency of remating is equal in all strains. An analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was applied to test the variation in mean remating days among different strains. To test the differences in the mean duration of copulation between first and second matings, the Students t-test (paired, for dependent samples) was used.
3. Results
Table 1 shows the remating frequency and remating
latency in ten mass-cultured wild-type strains of D. ananassae. The remating
percentage varies from 24% (PAT) to 56% (JM). However, the variation is not statistically
significant as indicated by the c 2 test (c 2 = 10·10;
df = 9, P > 0·05). JM (56%) and Baripada (50%) strains show
the highest remating frequency, while PAT (24%) shows the lowest. The JM and Baripada
strains were established in 1987 and the PAT strain was established in 1990. Thus there is
no direct relation between the number of generations the strains have been maintained in
the laboratory and the remating frequency. The mean number of remating days varies from
6·11 (ELEN) to 8·75 (CHIN). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for mean number of remating
days (table 1) shows a significant variation (F = 2·05, P < 0·05)
among different strains. The longest remating latency was observed in the CHIN strain and
the shortest in ELEN strain, although both strains were established in 1993. Thus, there
is no relation between the number of generations the strains have been kept in the
laboratory and the remating latency. Table 2 presents a comparison of the duration of
copulation
(in min) between first and second matings (remating) in different strains of D. ananassae.
In all the strains, duration of copulation is significantly shorter in second matings as
compared to first matings. However, the level of significance varies between the different
strains.
4. Discussion
During the course of the present study, ten mass culture wildtype strains of D. ananassae derived from flies collected from different geographic localities were tested for female remating frequency, remating days and the duration of copulation in first and second matings (remating). In the present experiments, female remating frequency varied from 24% to 56% among the strains of D. ananassae tested. However, this variation is not statistically significant. Significant variation has been observed for remating days in different strains (table 1). Female remating in D. ananassae occurs after at least 6 days using the periodic confinement technique. In female remating studies primarily two techniques, i.e., continuous confinement and periodic confinement, have been used by various investigators and female remating frequency varies considerably in different species (Smith 1956; Richmond and Ehrman 1974; Prout and Bundgaard 1977; Gromko and Pyle 1978; Pyle and Gromko 1978; Beckenbach 1981; Loukas et al 1981; Wu 1983; Turner and Anderson 1984; Markow and Ankey 1984; Markow 1985; Barbadilla et al 1991; Aspi 1992; McRobert et al 1997). There are only few studies, in which female remating has been observed in natural populations in certain species of Drosophila (Richmond and Powell 1970; Anderson 1974; Milkman and Zeitler 1974; Cobbs 1977; Craddock and Johnson 1978; Levine et al 1980; Griffiths et al 1982; Aspi and Lankinen 1992; Harshman and Clark 1998).
In female remating studies the 2 h periodic
confinement technique has been used by Gromko and Pyle (1978) in
D. melanogaster and by McRobert et al (1997) in D. biarmipes
and D. melanogaster. In D. melanogaster, it was found that
about 80% of the females remate when remating was observed for 12 days (Gromko and Pyle
1978). McRobert et al (1997) studied remating in D. melanogaster
and D. biarmipes during 2 h periodic confinement for 14 days and
compared the post-copulatory behaviour of D. biarmipes and D. melanogaster
females. Females from both species were shown to undergo a series of behavioural changes
following mating, including significant reduction in both sexual attractiveness and
receptivity. However, while both attractiveness and receptivity return to "virgin
like" levels within a few days in D. melanogaster, D. biarmipes
females which regained their sexual attractiveness within a few days, remained unreceptive
to copulation for at least two weeks. They also tested remating frequency in both species
and found that about 26% of D. biarmipes females mated at least twice and
that the mean remating latency was 10·8 days. In contrast, in D. melanogaster,
87% of the females remated and remating latency was 6·4 days. We have
also followed the 2 h periodic confinement technique in D. ananassae
and observed remating for 12 days. In D. ananassae the average female
remating frequency is 39·4% and the mean remating latency is 7·17 days.

D. melanogaster and D. ananassae are cosmopolitan and domestic
species and belong to the melanogaster species group. The differences observed
between these two species in female remating frequency may be due to differences in the
reproductive biology of females between these two species.
Joly et al (1991) and Joly and
Lachaise (1993) studied female remating and compared the duration of copulation in first
and second matings in two geographic strains
of D. teissieri, which originated from two geographic localities in Africa
[(i) Mount Silinda, Zimbabwe, established in 1970; (ii) Tai forest, Ivory Coast,
established in 1981]. Joly and collaborators used periodic confinement techniques
(8 h) and scored remating after 24, 48 and 72 h delay. Joly and Lachaise (1993)
found a significant strain variation in female remating frequency. In one stock (Mount
Silinda) all females remated, while only about 16% females of the other strain (Tai)
remated. In both these strains the duration of copulation was longer during second mating
(Joly et al 1991). Interestingly, the two strains of D. teissieri
differ in sperm morphology. The Silinda males have very large sperm and females of this
strain remate with a high frequency. Based on the findings in D. teissieri,
Joly et al (1991) proposed that the stable coexistence of two fertile sperm
morphs (short and long) in one ejaculate is a mixed strategy, which has evolved via sperm
competition possibly in response to female facultative polyandry. Bressac et al
(1991) found high recurrence polyandry in D. littoralis and D. latifasciaeformis
(up to 3 mates within up to 8 h) and low recurrence polyandry in D. affinis
(female have only two rematings every 7 days). Furthermore, they also measured the
duration of copulation in first as well as in subsequent matings. Interestingly, their
results clearly indicate that there is no significant difference in the duration of
copulation when compared between different matings in D. littoralis and D.
latifasciaeformis. However, there is a significant decrease in the duration of
copulation from first to second mating in D. affinis, which is characterized
by low recurrence polyandry. The duration of copulation was measured in first as well as
second matings in all ten strains of D. ananassae. It is interesting to note
that invariably all the strains show a significantly shorter duration of copulation during
second mating (remating). In our preliminary study (Singh and Singh 1997) we also observed
a shorter duration of copulation during second matings in D. ananassae. If
the results of D. teissieri, D. littoralis, D. latifasciaeformis,
D. affinis and D. ananassae are compared with respect to the
incidence of rematings and duration of copulation, it may be concluded that significant
variation exists between the species and the species with low incidence of rematings takes
less time for copulation in second matings.
It is known, that the higher the level of stored sperm supply, the longer the latency for remating (Scott l987). It is also known that remating shortens the life span of females because components of ejaculates have toxic effects (Chapman et al l995). Thus, it may be suggested that different species may vary in the incidence of remating and duration of copulation due to differences in their reproductive biology and adaptation.
Acknowledgements
The present work was supported by the University
Grants Commission, New Delhi in the form of a research project to BNS and a project
fellowship to SRS. We thank
two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.
References
Anderson W W 1974 Frequent multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura; Am. Nat. 108 709711
Aspi J 1992 Incidence and adaptive significance of multiple mating in females of two boreal Drosophila virilis group species; Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29 147159
Aspi J and Lankinen P 1992 Frequency of multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila montana; Hereditas 117 169177
Barbadilla A, Quezada-diaz J E, Ruiz A, Santos M and Fontdevila A 1991 The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XVII. Double mating and sperm predominance; Genet. Sel. Evol. 23 133140
Bastock M 1956 A gene mutation that changes a behaviour pattern; Evolution 10 421439
Bateman A J 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila; Heredity 2 349368
Beckenbach A T 1981 Multiple mating and the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura; Evolution 35 275281
Bressac C, Jolly D, Devaux J and Lachaise D 199l Can we predict the mating pattern of Drosophila females from the sperm length distribution in males?; Experientia 47 111114
Casares P, Carracedo M C, Rio B D, Pineiro R, Garcia-Florez L and Barros A R 1998 Disentangling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila; Evolution 52 126133
Chapman T, Liddle L, Kalb J, Wolfner M and Partridge L l995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by male accessory gland products; Nature (London) 373 241244
Chapman T, Trevitt S and Partridge L 1994 Remating and male derived nutrients in Drosophila melanogaster; J. Evol. Biol. 7 5169
Chatterjee S and Singh B N 1987 Variation in mating behaviour of Beadex mutant and wild type Drosophila ananassae; Indian J. Exp. Biol. 25 278280
Chatterjee S and Singh B N 1988 Effect of light and dark on mating behaviour of red eye and white eye Drosophila ananassae; Indian J. Exp. Biol. 26 611614
Cobbs G 1977 Multiple insemination and male sexual selection in natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura; Am. Nat. 111 641656
Craddok E M and Johnson W E 1978 Multiple insemination in natural populations of Drosophila silvestris; Drosophila Inf. Serv. 53 138139
Dobzhansky T H and Pavlovsky O 1967 Repeated mating and sperm mixing in Drosophila pseudoobscura; Am. Nat. 101 527533
Etges W J and Heed W B 1992 Remating effects on the genetic structure of female life histories in populations of Drosophila mojavensis; Heredity 68 515528
Griffiths R C, Mckechnie S W and Mckenzie J A 1982 Multiple mating and sperm displacement in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster; Theor. Appl. Genet. 62 8996
Gromko M H and Pyle D W 1978 Sperm competition, male fitness, and repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster; Evolution 32 588593
Harshman L G and Clark A G l998 Inference of sperm competition from broods of field caught Drosophila; Evolution 52 13341341
Joly D and Lachaise D 1993 Multiple mating frequency differs in two different geographic strains of Drosophila teissieri; Drosophila Inf. Serv. 72 126127
Joly D, Cariou M L and Lachaise D 1991 Can sperm competition explain sperm polymorphism in Drosophila teissieri?; Evol. Biol. 5 2544
Letsinger J T and Gromko M H 1985 The role of sperm numbers in sperm competition and female remating in Drosophila melanogaster; Genetics 66 195202
Levine L, Asmussen M, Olvera O, Powell J R, Delarosa M E, Salceda V M, Gaso M I, Guzman J and Anderson W W 1980 Population genetics of Maxican Drosophila. V. A high rate of multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura; Am. Nat. 116 493503
Loukas M, Vergini Y and Krimbas C B 1981 The
genetics
of Drosophila subobscura populations. XVIII. Multiple insemination and sperm
displacement in Drosophila subobscura; Genetica 57 2937
Manning A 1962 A sperm factor affecting the receptivity of Drosophila melanogaster females; Nature (London) 194 252253
Markow T A 1985 A comparative investigation of mating system of Drosophila hydei; Anim. Behav. 33 775781
Markow T A and Ankey P F 1984 Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple mating species; Science 224 302303
McRobert S P, Adams C R, Wutjke M, Frank J and Jackson L L 1997 A comparison of female postcopulatory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes; J. Insect. Behav. 10 761770
Milkman R and Zeitler R R 1974 Concurrent multiple paternity in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster; Genetics 78 11911193
Parker G A 1970 Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects; Biol. Rev. 45 525567
Parsons P A 1973 Behavioral and ecological genetics: A study in Drosophila (Oxford: Clarenden Press)
Prout T and Bundgaard J 1977 The population genetics of sperm displacement; Genetics 85 95124
Pyle D W and Gromko M H 1978 Repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster: the adaptive importance; Experientia 34 449450
Richmond R C and Ehrman L 1974 Incidence of repeated mating in the superspecies Drosophila paulistorum; Experientia 30 489490
Richmond R C and Powell J R 1970 Evidence of heterosis associated with an enzyme locus in a natural population of Drosophila; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67 12641267
Schwartz J M and Boake C R B 1992 Sexual dimorphism in remating in Hawaiian Drosophila species; Anim. Behav. 44 231238
Scott D l987 The timing of the sperm effect on female Drosophila melanogaster receptivity; Anim. Behav. 35 142149
Service P M and Vossbrink R E 1996 Genetic variation in "first" male effects on egg laying and remating by female Drosophila melanogaster; Behav. Genet. 26 3948
Singh B N 1985 Drosophila ananassae a genetically unique species; Nucleus 28 169176
Singh B N 1996 Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae; Genetica 97 321329
Singh B N and Chatterjee S 1986 Mating ability of homo- and heterokaryotypes of Drosophila ananassae from natural populations; Heredity 57 7578
Singh B N and Chatterjee S 1987 Variation in mating propensity and fertility in isofemale strains of Drosophila ananassae; Genetica 73 237242
Singh B N and Chatterjee S 1988a Parallelism between male mating propensity and chromosome arrangement frequency in natural populations of Drosophila ananassae; Heredity 60 269272
Singh B N and Chatterjee S 1988b Selection for high and low mating propensity in Drosophila ananassae; Behav. Genet. 18 357369
Singh B N and Chatterjee S 1989 Rare male mating advantage in Drosophila ananassae; Genet. Sel. Evol. 21 447455
Singh B N and Pandey M 1993 Selection for high and low pupation height in Drosophila ananassae; Behav. Genet. 23 239243
Singh B N and Singh S R 1999 Mating success in Drosophila ananassae: evidence for greater variation in receptivity of females as compared to male mating ability; Curr. Sci. 77 12001203
Singh S R and Singh B N 1997 Female remating in Drosophila ananassae; Drosophila Inf. Serv. 80 3839
Singh S R and Singh B N 1999 Mating activity and fitness of a few wild type strains of Drosophila ananassae; Indian J. Exp. Biol. 37 605608
Sisodia S and Singh B N 1996 Evidence for positive correlation between duration of copulation and fertility in Drosophila bipectinata; Zool. Stud. 35 2529
Smith M J 1956 Fertility, mating behavior and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura; J. Genet. 54 261279
Spiess E B 1970 Mating propensity and its genetic basis in Drosophila; in Essay in evolution and genetics in honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky (eds) M K Hecht and W C Steere (New York: Appleton Century Crofts) pp 315379
Spieth H T and Ringo J N 1983 Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila; in The genetics and biology of Drosophila (eds) M Ashburner, H L Carson and J N Thompson (London: Academic Press) pp 223284
Srivastava T and Singh B N 1996 Bidirectional selection for choice of oviposition site in Drosophila ananassae; Korean J. Genet. 18 295300
Tobari Y N 1993 Drosophila ananassae: Genetical and biological aspects (Japan: Scientific Societies Press)
Turner M E and Anderson W W 1984 Sperm predominance among Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes; Evolution 38 983995
Wu C I l983 Virility deficiency and the sex ratio trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura. II. Multiple mating and over all virility selection; Genetics 105 663679
Yamamoto D, Jallon J M and Komatsu A 1997 Genetic dissection of sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster; Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42 551585
MS received 3 May 1999; accepted 15 September 1999
Corresponding editor: Barbara Schmitz